[Link] Not being there: on prophylactic media and remoteness

In promising to eliminate distance, virtuality also promised to erase the difference between presence and absence. We would always be there, wherever “there” happened to be. That seemed plausible when our virtual selves were engaged in the traditional pursuits of media — news and entertainment, play and performance, information production and information gathering — but it was revealed to be an illusion as soon as social media became our means of living. Being remote is a drag. The state of absence, a physical state but also a psychic one, is a state of loneliness and frustration, angst and ennui.


The architecture of Zoom is the architecture of the panopticon.

And, then, kind of a sudden turn at the end of the piece.

Original source: Not being there: on prophylactic media and remoteness