What they will not do is maintain steady eye contact or smile. If a stranger of the opposite sex smiles at you, it’s best to do as the French do and return only a blank look before turning away. If you smile back, you might find yourself in a Pepé Le Pew–type situation.
Traveling back from San Francisco.
Traveling to San Francisco at the end of this week.
You can tell an Ingress user because (a.) they all are looking at their phones, and, (b.) they look like people who go to barcamps.
- Hey there! It’s been awhile. I warned you, things are monkey-balls over here.
Tech & Work World
Nancy Gohring summarizes OpenStack vendor sports of late – an excellent, concise overview of the OpenStack movements of late. Nancy is one of the best tech reporters out there working on cloud. I’m glad she’s over on thenewstack.io too.
Double Whammy: IBM Sheds Chip Unit As Financial Woes Hit Hard – Power lives on. Notice that they had to pay someone $1.5bn to divest of the chip unit. While it’s easy to chuckle at that, that takes a strong grasp on your corporate strategy plans and some courage to do.
OpenStack Investors Place Big Bet On Mirantis – well, these guys seem to be doing fine. Things were rough at first with them, as with any consultancy moving to product, crossed with dealing with the “tire fire” that OpenStack was years ago (I note that the tire-firage was just due to it being over-hyped by some folks, the good eggs over there were very up-front about things). Also see the 451 coverage, and Bloomberg’s Jack Clark.
Microsoft Professes Love for Linux, Adds Support for CoreOS, Cloudera and Host of New Features – I like these CoreOS folks. Their approach is interesting. The whole notion of “Linux written the way an (application) programmer would do it” is fascinating and promising to me, a person who always cringed at having to open up a
CA’s DevOps The Worst-Kept Secret to Winning in the Application Economy – a not too shabby vendor-commissioned survey (hey, Plexiglas houses) on DevOps. The question on when you plan to do DevOps is esp. good (for some reason, we haven’t asked that in our past two DevOps surveys). At the moment, I’d say CA is the vendor in their class (Big 4, incumbent, legacy, “makes shit tons of money” – whatever you want to call it ;>) that is doing DevOps marketing best.
If I don’t say so myself, I think Software Defined Talk has hit its stride. The three of us have a good mix and tone, and I hope you’re enjoying it.
At the spur of the moment, we had Andrew Shafer on our most recent episode, so we talked at length about Docker, both at a technical and strategy level. He’d just published a good article on the topic. It was a great conversation.
Also, you can hear me complaining about how my diamond shoes are pitching my toes, which is to say, wanting someone to fix calendaring.
There’s two kinds of clouds in the world…
I’m fond of pointing out the theory that, for the most part, cloud only matters if you’re talking about developers. You’re probably not going to run packaged software – SharePoint, Lawson, SAP, etc. – on cloud stuff: the incremental benefit vs. plain old virtualization (VMware) likely isn’t there (yet?). Thus, there’s this unhelpful discuss of cloud that doesn’t distinguish between running “old (mostly packaged) software” and (mostly net-new) custom written software. To put it another way, if you were doing lead qualification for cloud deals (public IaaS/PaaS or private), the first question should probably be “how many developers do you have on staff?”
There are exceptions, etc; hence: “theory.”
An old friend of mine, Zane, and I were discussing this in email recently. In reply to him complaining about over-hyping cloud, I replied:
Yeah, this assessment is pretty much right. I think the thing about cloud, to your point, is that unless you’re going to dramatically change the way you write applications, it’s just slightly better virtualization.
Now virtualization, that’s certainly a big deal…but the step order improvement from cloud is not that big [I’d theorize].
The part people often miss about cloud is the self-service/fulfillment changes. It’s about dramatically reducing the reliance of service desks and manual IT and instead automating provisioning new IT and the ongoing management of it (server is in bad state, reboot it). [Or, as covered in a recent DevOps Cafe podcast with Tom Limoncelli: in a cloud world, tickets are filed when things go wrong, not for any old request.]
“Private cloud” is another weird thing that I’ve yet to fully understand. It seems like just setting yourself up for the same old management problems, that maybe move a bit faster, but is it really so much better than just a bunch of VMware with self-service…or moving more of your stuff straight to SaaS? [I was called the “private cloud analyst who doesn’t believe in private cloud” in a briefing recently, which seems pretty much right.]
For developers – like yourself – cloud will always be more tedious than it seems…because you guys are doing more than just installing software and using SaaSes. I think the big hope for cloud is that (a.) IT admins have to spend less time manually caring and feeding for compute, storage, and networking (much of that work is manual now-a-days!), and (b.) companies move more and more of their on-premises packaged software to SaaS. Managing GMail (or even Office 365, I should hope) should be magnitudes of order more easy than managing on-premises Exchange. To me, this migration of on-premises packaged software to SaaS is the real boon…and why SaaS tends to be larger as a market and more valued.
We’ll see how it shakes out, but to my mind if there’s a SaaS version for a product it almost makes no sense to run the on-premises packages software on your own, or even colo’d somewhere…unless you have developers on staff, in which case there’s a whole other conversation to be had.
Fun & IRL
Inside Jokes: “Good luck with no fuckin’ head”
Mastrionotti: Started in Kansas City. Couple of housewives.
Deutsch: Couple days ago we see the same M.O. out in Los Feliz.
Mastrionotti: Doctor. Ear, nose and throat man.
Deutsch: All of which he’s now missin’.
Mastrionotti: Well, some of his throat was there.
Deutsch: Physician, heal thyself.
Mastrionotti: Good luck with no fuckin’ head.
So, next time you see an absurd situation in front of you and someone’s asking you to fix it, just sigh and utter out, “good luck with no fuckin’ head.” I’ll know what you’re saying, and we’ll high-five.
FRONTSIDE.IO – HIRE THEM! Do you need some developer talent? When you have a web project that needs the “A Team,” call The Frontside. They’ve spent years honing their tools and techniques that give their clients cutting-edge web applications without losing a night’s sleep. Learn more at http://frontside.io/cote
Come hear me yammer on about DevOps: I’ll be in Toronto (Nov 18th) giving my DevOps and cloud talk with TechTarget
- We’ve got 56 subscribers, and I appreciate each and everyone of you. If you like this bit, forward it to your friends, and if you don’t, setup an auto-filter to forward it to your enemies!
- Elsewhere: @cote, cote.io, email@example.com
- Archives: http://coteindustries.com/tagged/cotememo
- Subscribe: http://coteindustries.com/memo
docker has a straightforward CLI that allows you to do almost everything you could want to a container. All of these commands use the image id (ex. be29975e0098), the image name (ex. myusername/webapp) and the container id (ex. 72d468f455ea) interchangably depending on the operation you are trying to do. This is confusing at first, so pay special attention to what you’re using.
Pro-tip: whenever you come up with a snappy marketing line, see what the opposite of it sounds like. Does that opposite state ever occur, is it “normal”? If not, then you might just have kind of said nothing.
To pick on this image (I’m sure they were well intentioned), does anyone create software to disempower people? (Let’s set aside viruses and NSA spying – even that software is written to empower the “bad guys” and spies, though, right?). No: computers, if functioning properly, are always there to empower people. That is, until the computers (or aliens) take over.
So, what you’d want to know is how the software empowers people.
I often call this the “computers are awesome!” anti-pattern in tech marketing. One might shorten and modernize it as “Because computers!”